ContextWind turbine, capture the most
ApproachBoost + P&O MPPT (Simulink)
ResultCp ≈ 0.44, ~2.4× energy
Context
Individual first-year Master's lab in MESI (Renewable Energy module), supervised by Prof. Dominique Knittel. A turbine drives a DC generator that feeds a load. The task was to compare three control strategies to see which one extracts the most power.
What I did
- Direct connection, to recover the Cp(λ) curve and the maximum power point (about 7.5 kW).
- Boost chopper with a PI on the output voltage, switching at 10 kHz.
- Perturb & Observe MPPT, which finds the top of the power curve on its own.
- Static and dynamic study of each case.
What I noticed and learned
- The smarter the control, the more power is extracted, without touching the hardware.
- The Boost can only raise the voltage. A Buck-Boost would remove this limit.
My mistakes
- My first PI was too aggressive and oscillated, so I had to cut the gains sharply.
- I reused a photovoltaic P&O code. With a Boost on a wind turbine, the step signs had to be inverted.
- At very high power, the model diverges, because the components were not sized.
Results
- Cp ≈ 0.44 with the MPPT, close to the maximum of the turbine.
- About 2.4 times more power captured than regulation alone.
- Without regulation, a load step changed the voltage by a factor of 31.
Tech stack
MATLAB
Simulink
powergui / Specialized Power Systems
Génératrice PMDC
Hacheur Boost
Régulation PI
MPPT Perturb & Observe
Solveur ode4 pas fixe (1 µs)